Data Privacy | Polylogues

Knowledge Privateness | Polylogues



Privateness is vitally necessary to a free society. However specialists don’t all the time even agree on methods to outline it, not to mention why it issues a lot. On this episode of Polylogues, laptop scientist Adam Smith, statistician Frauke Kreuter, and thinker Helen Nissenbaum talk about how their disciplines method one of many central technosocial problems with our time, and their very own work to guard privateness within the digital age, in a dialog hosted by Science Communicator in Residence Konstantin Kakaes.

Interviews recorded in Spring 2019, through the Simons Institute analysis program on Knowledge Privateness: Foundations and Purposes.

© Simons Institute for the Principle of Computing, 2021

2 thoughts on “Knowledge Privateness | Polylogues

  1. I really think that data privacy is an issue that is not well addressed by academics. It's a very practical issue that people working at companies have to address and solve. A lot of the fear mongering over what can be discovered using data, normally comes from academic statisticians or computer scientists, who have little understanding of what the practical realities are for people at companies, whose capabilities are often much less than imagined and whose motivations are aimed at developing and selling product rather than investigating people.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *